![]() In between heartbreaking original interviews and the tense playback of interrogation videos, Ricciardi and Demos often train their camera on the other cameras in the room: the TV reporters and crews they spent months alongside covering the trial and its postcourt news conferences. ![]() Making a Murderer indulges in the easiest of true-crime tropes: the news media as exploiters. It grabs people's attention," she says before adding gleefully, "Right now, murder is hot." In the fourth episode of Making a Murderer, the filmmakers show an old interview with a Dateline producer. To Ricciardi and Demos, Dateline even seems to be a punchline. Dateline is watched, but no one is breathlessly dissecting the latest instalment with co-workers come Monday morning. But there was no frenzy then, no White House petitions for Avery's release. An episode in 2006 was even one of the first in-depth looks at the Avery case outside Wisconsin. Yet little gratitude is ever given to the likes of Dateline or other mainstream network news programs, where true crime has been a staple for roughly forever.ĭateline and its murder-mystery format, for instance, has been a weekend tradition on NBC since 1992, drawing millions of viewers every week. ![]() "We revisited the Paradise Lost trilogy as inspiration a lot," filmmakers Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos said in a recent interview with Time magazine, in which they also referenced The Staircase, an eight-parter that aired on Sundance in 2004. Who really did it? Why didn't they question that other guy? It's so obvious – can't the jury see what we see?įor the minds behind these shows, the creative lineage of their work traces back to highly lauded crime documentaries of the past. They are all, objectively, compelling and compulsive entertainment. Making a Murderer is rightly discussed in the same breath as other recent serializations of true-crime tales: The Jinx, the six-part HBO series about Robert Durst and the mysterious disappearance of his wife and the first season of Serial, the 12-part radio program that follows host Sarah Koenig's quest for the truth in the death of a Maryland teenager. (And I do mean immediate: Many viewers binged all 10-plus hours of the series in days, if not one sleepless night.) It proved to be the most popular holiday release not named Star Wars, immediately spurring a digital cottage industry of amateur sleuths determined to discover if Avery really is a killer. If you don't know what happens next, well, where have you been for the past month? A week before Christmas, Netflix quietly offered up the 10-part Making a Murderer documentary series, an exhaustive examination of what the filmmakers present as a case of police corruption against the accused. In 2005, a Wisconsin man named Steven Avery was charged with murder. True crime – or, at least, a certain kind of hyperstylized vision of it – is having a moment. After all, that Dateline episode aired last spring, months before pop culture's current obsession with a different decade-old killing in Netflix's Making a Murderer. The majority of television viewers can be forgiven for their unfamiliarity with the case against psychic Daniel Perez. Lurid details are exposed! Are you hooked yet? The show is only a few clicks away: Simply go to Dateline's website and look for the recent episode titled Angels and Demons. Witnesses come forward for the first time. In a new documentary, viewers will be drawn into the world of a decade-long murder investigation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |